Spinpasta Wiki:Requests for Bureaucrat/CalasanX

Done. LOLSKELETONS ^(talk) 06:49, December 15, 2013 (UTC)

I know that I haven't fulfilled all of the prerequisites for this yet, but we need an active bureaucrat to handle User Rights here. I've done a multitude of things in month and a half I have been admin, and I feel I'm up for the job.

I proposed the RCaDC, which is now a user right. I also single handedly dismantled the People category, and created the Suggested Reading category. I also have done a lot of clean up in Marked for Review, and was the one who created the Request pages for the wiki, though it was not my idea. As far as edits, I have the second to most on the wiki, at 1,583 edits, with at least 749 on articles. The current high is 2,393.

I've also created the Delete Now category, for normal users, in hopes to stop them from adding the Flagged for Deletion, and help bring extremely bad pastas to admin attention quickly, as well as the Userstats template for this wiki for being able to easily tell the number of edits for a user using the template.

I know how to promote and demod users, and I will not abuse the rights.

Support -: {{Support}}
Neutral -: {{Neutral}}
Oppose -: {{Oppose}}

Please sign your replies!

Support - you're a cool person I want you to be a admin ;) I wish I was admin but o we'll (Creepydog101 (talk))Creepydog101 what's that behind you!!!

Neutral - You're a good person, and I do respect that. But, some of the stuff that you have done (like letting users decide what should be the Suggested Reading rather than having an active admin meeting and discuss about this, and the user categories; which I would've liked to be informed on that.) But, there are some actions that you have done which I liked (like the removal of the People category, which was cancer itself.) So, on some stuff that you do, are appropriate, but some are not and needed to be discussed with myself, Meta, and maybe SOMEGUY. But, we do need an active bureaucrat though. So, my standpoint is neutral. A stalemate, if you will.

Do you hear that? That's the grape roaring. (talk) 03:19, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Support - You deserve to be one, you did have some great changes, but unfortunately, some that caused problems (i.e: Sonic.exe getting blacklisted, that caused some stir and made a friend leave), but after all, you're a nice person, and I believe you deserve to be a bureaucraut, as long as you think twice before doing something big.

Rickomarow -Contact me!- 03:23, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose - Not qualified, and the first post I made vanished, I suspect foul play. Swablu164 (talk) 03:35, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Support - Calasan I think you would make an amazing one, I Oppose - the Oppose - for you to not be one, you have my full Support - {{SUBST:User:Irishninja0/sig}} 05:04, December 13, 2013 (UTC)irishninja0

Support - Per Rick. -- SOMEGUY123 (talk) 18:42, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Support - per rick Cruelgirl9671 (talk) 19:43, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Support - Well, I think you can have the chance of being promoted bureacrat. Things shall go well, though. We certainly do need an active b'crat here, so I think you are available for one. Keep doing the right things, we even appreciate your respect and your helpful work for the community. I am looking forward for you to be b'crat :)